Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? love live! 272
- ? love live! school idol project 164
Character
- ? eli ayase 72
- ? hanayo koizumi 8
- ? honoka kousaka 21
- ? kotori minami 20
- ? maki nishikino 62
- ? nico yazawa 42
- ? nozomi toujou 90
- ? rin hoshizora 11
- ? umi sonoda 12
Artist
- ? sendy1992 36
General
- ? barefoot 11976
- ? black hair 30130
- ? blonde hair 33001
- ? blue eyes 17171
- ? blue hair 13134
- ? blush 36630
- ? bottomless 40791
- ? breasts 103253
- ? brown eyes 6520
- ? brown hair 29264
- ? expressionless 20336
- ? female only 56882
- ? green eyes 9321
- ? hair ribbon 1408
- ? long hair 57936
- ? multiple girls 15438
- ? multiple subs 9547
- ? nude 38468
- ? orange hair 5813
- ? ponytail 12267
- ? purple eyes 6673
- ? purple hair 10948
- ? red eyes 9405
- ? red hair 15615
- ? ribbon 3075
- ? short hair 40958
- ? spiral eyes 23736
- ? standing 12416
- ? standing at attention 5690
- ? symbol in eyes 32199
- ? topless 44495
- ? twintails 10767
- ? yellow eyes 4771
Meta
- ? absurdres 34454
- ? censored 6612
- ? text 82236
Statistics
- Id: 66637
-
Posted: 2018-07-10 07:40:53
by kirbysuper123 - Size: 3850x1900
- Source: www.deviantart.com/sendy1...n-Drawings-Muse-702074416
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 129 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #269377
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #269378
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I think kisekae is not allowed or something. Is that still true?
I don't think this is Kisekae. Just read the comments on parent post.
This is just re-upload of that post because of high quality.
>> #269392
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't think this is Kisekae. Just read the comments on parent post.
This is just re-upload of that post because of high quality.
Huh. I don't think I would've noticed this wasn't Kisekae if the comments there didn't say so. They look *a lot* like Kisekae girls, but the faces look too... distinctly shaded to be Kisekae. Plus, looking at a Kisekae picture, the shadows under the boobs look different. They don't look like thin footballs.
>> #269393
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Huh. I don't think I would've noticed this wasn't Kisekae if the comments there didn't say so. They look *a lot* like Kisekae girls, but the faces look too... distinctly shaded to be Kisekae. Plus, looking at a Kisekae picture, the shadows under the boobs look different. They don't look like thin footballs.
Still, I don't think there's prove that this is actually made using that.
>> #269401
Score: 0 (vote Up)
the legs (particularly the knees), hands, breasts, and hips are all definitely non-kisekae or redrawn.
it does look very paper doll copy/paste though, and I could swear we already had this argument about this exact image somewhere
>> #269449
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I think kisekae is not allowed or something. Is that still true?
Why wouldn't kisekae be allowed? Because of the flood of images? I kinda like it.
>> #269564
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #269953
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Why wouldn't kisekae be allowed? Because of the flood of images? I kinda like it.
Yeah, since everyone can use that and flood everything with they Kisekae story or something.
>> #269969
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Yeah, since everyone can use that and flood everything with they Kisekae story or something.
Yeah, I don't have a problem with it or anything. In fact, I like it, too. Wasn't trying to get it taken down or asking anyone to do it.
It's just that I thought I remembered there was some kind of rule about it once before, and was curious about that, so I was just asking if that was true or not. I had actually forgot.
But I also know that some people like to use these as a basis and do edits to it, so i'm guessing that's what this is.