Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? hyperdimension neptunia 319
Character
- ? noire 58
Artist
- ? oekakizuki 16
- ? rize (manipper) 30
General
- ? beach 908
- ? bikini 5015
- ? black hair 30188
- ? blush 36725
- ? breasts 103343
- ? cleavage 22926
- ? collarbone 7278
- ? expressionless 20373
- ? female only 56973
- ? femdom 30108
- ? femsub 132079
- ? hair ribbon 1409
- ? happy trance 46654
- ? hypnotic drug 880
- ? large breasts 58326
- ? long hair 58004
- ? lying 2087
- ? open mouth 46960
- ? red eyes 9427
- ? ribbon 3079
- ? spiral eyes 23753
- ? swimsuit 2978
- ? symbol in eyes 32222
- ? twintails 10785
- ? water 379
- ? yuri 6333
Meta
- ? caption 8911
- ? caption only 2824
- ? manip 16627
- ? text 82406
Statistics
- Id: 67926
-
Posted: 2018-08-10 05:20:02
by Rize - Size: 2000x1500
- Source: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4370745
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 158 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #274463
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Please remember to tag the original artists, and include a source link.
>> #274476
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #275143
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #275145
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm pretty sure "Massive text wall" isn't a legit reason to delete anything.
Rules have been updated for text manips
Text manips with little relation to what is portrayed in the image or has excessive grammar and spelling errors
>> #275146
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Rules have been updated for text manips
Text manips with little relation to what is portrayed in the image or has excessive grammar and spelling errors
Yeah, but I can see "Reason: Massive text wall". That doesn't sound like a issue.
If you are really deleting manips to fit new rules, then at least tell people exacly what's the issue.
I didn't saw this post, so I'm not sure if the story was so massive and complex that it didn't go with the image or if there were some grammar/spelling errors.
And I think manipper doesn't know that too.
>> #275147
Score: 0 (vote Up)
(The original looked better, imgur put a bunch of artifacts on it)
And while the story is a bit longer than my usual, it's not that long, especially compared to other manips from other users, that are still here.
>> #275151
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This is the post: i.imgur.com/kO10L1I.jpg
(The original looked better, imgur put a bunch of artifacts on it)
And while the story is a bit longer than my usual, it's not that long, especially compared to other manips from other users, that are still here.
This is great, why the hell was that deleted?
>> #275157
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This is great, why the hell was that deleted?
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
>> #275158
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
Are YOU kidding?
The reason for deleting this is "massive text wall", how is that even related to the eyes on the picture?
Actually, what's wrong with her eyes? They look fine to me, what rules are they breaking?
Size of the text and background are also okay, because you can read all of this withouth any problems.
It really looks like a mod just said "nah, fuck it, I don't like it"
>> #275160
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are you kidding?
look at the crude manip job on the eyes also the size of the text compared to image and also the background.
What? I've used those eyes in at least 6 manips before, the effect isn't that easy to do, I bet you can't replicate it, and the original eyes were slowly deleted to a pixel level precision, I even kept the original hair transparencies over the eyes, the text looks perfectly fine without jpeg artifacts that imgur adds once you see the image in full size, it's size 24 in photoshop, that isn't small. The background is just a color to contrast the dialogue, if it's too bright that can be easily changed, but nobody said anything while the image was still here, so that didn't look like a reason for deletion either.