Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? fate/grand order 1861
- ? fate (series) 2475
Character
- ? florence nightingale 40
- ? minamoto no raikou 100
Artist
- ? ni crying 19
- ? nobody67 (manipper) 72
General
- ? aphrodisiac 230
- ? bikini 4999
- ? breasts 103254
- ? cameltoe 2006
- ? clothed exposure 4243
- ? femdom 30058
- ? high heels 10062
- ? huge breasts 22226
- ? hypnotic drug 880
- ? injection 702
- ? kneeling 7144
- ? large breasts 58283
- ? long hair 57936
- ? looking at viewer 12574
- ? micro bikini 1386
- ? needle 444
- ? pov 8592
- ? pov sub 5004
- ? purple hair 10948
- ? see-through 2319
- ? spread legs 8858
- ? syringe 307
- ? thighhighs 17590
Meta
- ? caption 8906
- ? caption only 2823
- ? manip 16632
- ? text 82238
Statistics
- Id: 76123
-
Posted: 2019-03-07 23:46:45
by Nobody67 - Size: 1850x1100
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=65644679
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 174 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #307696
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307697
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307699
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307763
Score: 0 (vote Up)
thats a dick move
I mean, she never technically lied: she says that one syringe contains "sub" serum (technically true, but so does the other one), and then says "if you were to take 'dom' serum..." NOT that the other syringe has "dom" serum.
But still, yes, definitely a dick move.
>> #307788
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307791
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307792
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Joke's on her - both of them would be sub because that's not how you use a darn antidote, stupid lil big-tiddy BEEYATCH
I mean... you're not fucking wrong.....
>> #307944
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm getting serious Princess Bride vibes here.....
[spoiler=sub serum]iocane powder[/spoiler]
>> #307992
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm getting serious Princess Bride vibes here.....
didn't the guy who wrote that book die in January?
>> #349283
Score: 0 (vote Up)
[spoiler=sub serum]iocane powder[/spoiler]
Finally somebody else who understands the reference! Too bad you got to the post before me...