alexis_rhodes blonde_hair blue_eyes breasts brown_hair collar dancer empty_eyes expressionless femsub gloves harem_outfit large_breasts long_hair maid malroth see-through short_hair simple_background tea_gardner thighhighs yellow_eyes yu-gi-oh! yu-gi-oh!_gx

5 comments (0 hidden)

petal
>> #748
Posted on 2013-09-03 23:26:28
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Is there a particular reason the slave_outfit tag is gone? That was one of my favorite tags.

Mindwipe
>> #749
Posted on 2013-09-03 23:37:29
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Vanndril insisted it be removed. It's basically been replaced by the "dancer" tag, since they wear the same kind of outfit.

Vanndril
>> #753
Posted on 2013-09-04 05:13:01
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Not so much insisted, as brought up. Actually, hell, didn't YOU bring it up! XD But yes, the classic "dancer" outfit is practically the same thing that every "slave_outfit" tagged image used.

Mindwipe
>> #756
Posted on 2013-09-04 05:21:03
Score: 0 (vote Up)
gmail chat:

* Mindwipe: Fuck, I don't think we need the "dancer" tag. It looks like it's just "dancing slave_outfit".
** Which makes me wonder about the "belly dancer" tag too.

* Vanndril: we HAVE slave_outfit?

* Mindwipe: Yes.

* Vanndril: that seems...pointless
** that IS pointless

* Mindwipe: Honestly, the "slave outfit" looks like a belly dancer outfit.

* Vanndril: slave_outfit is a meaningless all-encompassing tag
** it covers so much ground while meaning nothing
** each part of the "slave outfit" should be tagged instead
** like collar or harness
** in addition
** belly_dancer shouldn't even be tagged slave_outfit
** so delete the shit out of the slave_outfit tag


Pretty much all you, bro. :P

Vanndril
>> #757
Posted on 2013-09-04 05:34:34
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Mindwipe said:
Pretty much all you, bro. :P

Ah, yes, so it was. I remember now. :P My issue with it was that it was entirely subjective. A slave outfit could have been anything, and anything that made an outfit stand out as a slave outfit can, itself, be tagged.

1