Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? my little pony 3394
Character
- ? applejack 319
- ? derpy hooves 42
- ? fluttershy 451
- ? pinkie pie 337
- ? rainbow dash 398
- ? rarity 448
- ? twilight sparkle 812
Artist
- ? mcaesar (manipper) 25
- ? trishbot 216
General
- ? barefoot 12878
- ? blonde hair 35491
- ? bottomless 43228
- ? breasts 110143
- ? cowgirl 182
- ? discolored nipples 892
- ? expressionless 21889
- ? feet 9710
- ? femsub 141817
- ? freckles 2151
- ? hat 7537
- ? horns 7611
- ? hypnotic eyes 10591
- ? kaa eyes 13613
- ? large breasts 60724
- ? long hair 61459
- ? maledom 38570
- ? multicolored hair 6855
- ? nipples 19362
- ? nude 41907
- ? open mouth 50260
- ? personification 594
- ? pink hair 11130
- ? standing 13857
- ? standing at attention 6174
- ? straight-cut bangs 1450
- ? topless 47058
- ? wings 3805
Meta
- ? caption 9265
- ? manip 17251
- ? text 88261
- ? western 9360
Statistics
- Id: 9858
-
Posted: 2013-09-30 00:28:53
by Reccy - Size: 2016x1200
- Source: trishbot.deviantart.com/a...Playthings-NSFW-259371349
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 46 (vote up)
This post belongs to a
parent post.
Child posts are often subsequent pages of a doujinshi, or minor variations of the parent post.
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #2006
Score: 0 (vote Up)
sleepymaid.com/chan/furry/res/1047.html#1097
How was my tagging?
>> #2008
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #2010
Score: 0 (vote Up)
How was my tagging?
Good enough that I copied them onto the other 2 versions of this pic (you left off the artist, btw). I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
>> #2013
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #2017
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Good enough that I copied them onto the other 2 versions of this pic (you left off the artist, btw). I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
Alright, thank you MindWipe!
>> #192928
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
Apparently someone put the furry tag back. That said, I think there IS enough to call this furry, so take that as you will.
>> #192930
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Apparently someone put the furry tag back. That said, I think there IS enough to call this furry, so take that as you will.
Disagreed. The skin color is clearly just skin color, a few of them have skin that's shining in a way fur definitely wouldn't. And I don't think tails and wings and colored skin qualify for furry.